Another MEASLES outbreak. Oh, the humanity! The War Against Disease is on. You know, like the successful wars against poverty, drugs, cancer. If you want poverty, drugs, cancer let the United States government declare war on it and you'll get plenty of it!
Measles is almost NEVER fatal in this day and age. In fact it supercharges a child’s immune system. You remember what an immune system is, don’t you?
“I’d rather have an autistic child than a dead child” is the damage control battle cry of pro-vaxers in response to the CDC report showing that the CDC has known about the causative MMR-autism link as early as 2003, revealed by whistleblower Dr. Bill Thompson. National spokesperson for Autism Speaks, Tommy Hilfiger cites a rate of one in 88 in his PSA that is still being aired. In 2007, another national spokesperson Toni Braxton quoted the rate as one in 150 when she engaged in her own campaign after her child was diagnosed. The current number is one in 68. Is the Mumps-Measles-Rubella vaccine the only cause of autism? Of course not. Is autism the only adverse reaction of this or other vaccines? Absolutely not.
Let's focus on this latest excuse to accelerate mandatory vaccination. Which disease in this ménage à trois vaccine is so fatal that pre-emptive, dangerous steps must be taken for even a remote chance that a child will not contract it? Measles? I just covered that. Mumps? I’ve never heard of mumps being a widespread threat. I have heard that if an adult male contracts mumps he won’t have to worry about vaccinating his future children because there won’t be any. I’ve also heard that the mumps strain used in the vaccine is from 1947, is ineffective, and the mumps vaccine was not to be administered within several weeks before or after any other vaccine. So how in the world did it end up in a combo? I also know recent outbreaks have been in “fully vaccinated” children. http://www.anh-usa.org/mumps-vaccine-proves-ineffective/
The third, Rubella…German Measles is like a regular cold—harmless for the most part, or so I recall from the sales campaign I witnessed as a child when the Rubella vaccine came out. The only problem I’ve ever heard of is that it is tragic if a woman contracts the illness during the first three months of pregnancy because of damage to the fetus. How likely is it that a woman will contract Rubella during this short period of time in her life? How often is a woman pregnant at all these days anyway? Is it worth brain damage or worse for our toddlers?
You would rather have an autistic child? As this latest measles outbreak is being used to support an ever-expanding mandatory vaccine schedule for our children and for all of us, I know the battle of words likely is useless. Firsthand accounts of vaccine reactions, no matter how horrific or tragic, are discredited, or dismissed as necessary risk. Pro-vaxers are quick to show photographs of the very few instances of complications of diseases like measles and chicken pox. Fight fire with fire you say? There are thousands upon thousands of examples, written and in photos, of vaccine damage.
The logic being used to tout vaccines is “Mumps can be dangerous therefore you must vaccinate”…even though we know Merck falsified the data and the outbreaks that occur are in Vaccinated Children. My analogy to statements like this is,
“Slipping in the shower can be dangerous…is there a vaccine for THAT?”
As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. You’ve just read five hundred. After looking at the following photos are more needed?
http://www.naturalnews.com/048691_vaccine_damaged_children_graphic_photos_medical_mutilation.html#
See also: http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/vaccine-fraud-vaccines-neither-safe-nor-effective/
Measles is almost NEVER fatal in this day and age. In fact it supercharges a child’s immune system. You remember what an immune system is, don’t you?
“I’d rather have an autistic child than a dead child” is the damage control battle cry of pro-vaxers in response to the CDC report showing that the CDC has known about the causative MMR-autism link as early as 2003, revealed by whistleblower Dr. Bill Thompson. National spokesperson for Autism Speaks, Tommy Hilfiger cites a rate of one in 88 in his PSA that is still being aired. In 2007, another national spokesperson Toni Braxton quoted the rate as one in 150 when she engaged in her own campaign after her child was diagnosed. The current number is one in 68. Is the Mumps-Measles-Rubella vaccine the only cause of autism? Of course not. Is autism the only adverse reaction of this or other vaccines? Absolutely not.
Let's focus on this latest excuse to accelerate mandatory vaccination. Which disease in this ménage à trois vaccine is so fatal that pre-emptive, dangerous steps must be taken for even a remote chance that a child will not contract it? Measles? I just covered that. Mumps? I’ve never heard of mumps being a widespread threat. I have heard that if an adult male contracts mumps he won’t have to worry about vaccinating his future children because there won’t be any. I’ve also heard that the mumps strain used in the vaccine is from 1947, is ineffective, and the mumps vaccine was not to be administered within several weeks before or after any other vaccine. So how in the world did it end up in a combo? I also know recent outbreaks have been in “fully vaccinated” children. http://www.anh-usa.org/mumps-vaccine-proves-ineffective/
The third, Rubella…German Measles is like a regular cold—harmless for the most part, or so I recall from the sales campaign I witnessed as a child when the Rubella vaccine came out. The only problem I’ve ever heard of is that it is tragic if a woman contracts the illness during the first three months of pregnancy because of damage to the fetus. How likely is it that a woman will contract Rubella during this short period of time in her life? How often is a woman pregnant at all these days anyway? Is it worth brain damage or worse for our toddlers?
You would rather have an autistic child? As this latest measles outbreak is being used to support an ever-expanding mandatory vaccine schedule for our children and for all of us, I know the battle of words likely is useless. Firsthand accounts of vaccine reactions, no matter how horrific or tragic, are discredited, or dismissed as necessary risk. Pro-vaxers are quick to show photographs of the very few instances of complications of diseases like measles and chicken pox. Fight fire with fire you say? There are thousands upon thousands of examples, written and in photos, of vaccine damage.
The logic being used to tout vaccines is “Mumps can be dangerous therefore you must vaccinate”…even though we know Merck falsified the data and the outbreaks that occur are in Vaccinated Children. My analogy to statements like this is,
“Slipping in the shower can be dangerous…is there a vaccine for THAT?”
As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. You’ve just read five hundred. After looking at the following photos are more needed?
http://www.naturalnews.com/048691_vaccine_damaged_children_graphic_photos_medical_mutilation.html#
See also: http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/vaccine-fraud-vaccines-neither-safe-nor-effective/